Meta 推出 Muse Wonder 前沿系列模型:主动记忆,遇阻换方法继续推进,Agent 编程媲美 Opus 5.5
跨会话记住背景,遇到变化接着推进任务;用对应评测和官方演示,看清两款模型的能力与差别。
Meta 推出了 Muse Wonder 前沿系列模型。本次发布包含 Muse Wonder 与能力更强的 Muse Wonder Full 两款主力模型。两款模型拥有 100 万 token 的推理上下文窗口,支持文本、图像、音频与视频的多模态输入,输出则为纯文本,并在千兆瓦级规模的 Prometheus 数据中心完成训练。
主要功能特点包括:
- Active Memory(主动记忆):跨会话保留重要背景,新任务中找回相关信息,并识别事实更新。
- Active Focus(持续推进):遇到阻碍调整方案,跟进多步骤任务,必要时提问、重要操作前确认。
- 专业领域知识(Domain Expertise):结合合同、财报和健康资料,分析问题并起草供审阅的文件。
- 持续软件开发(Frontier Coding):跟踪需求、跨文件修改代码,反复测试和修错,支持长期项目。
Meta 将它定位为迈向“个人超级智能”的一步:让 AI 结合个人背景,持续完成生活事务和专业工作。
两个版本,现在分别在哪里用?
- 现在:Muse Wonder 可通过 Meta Model API 和 Muse Code 使用;Full 仅向 Muse Code 订阅用户开放。
- 后续:Wonder 将接入 Muse,订阅用户优先,用于生成交互应用等需要更强智能的功能。Meta 还计划基于它开发面向全体 Muse 用户的专用模型。
四项能力,分别解决什么问题?
长期任务需要把前面的背景、执行中的变化和最后的结果连起来。记住要求只是起点,过程中还要调整做法,交付前再检查是否做对。
1. 主动记忆:记住背景,按新要求更新
每次办新事情都重新交代背景,会让助理很难用。Active Memory 会跨会话保留重要信息,在相关任务出现时主动找回,并识别更新。例如,规划出差时沿用你说过的出行偏好,要求改变后采用新条件。
100 万 token 上下文对应一次推理能处理的材料量。跨会话记忆还要把有用背景带到后续会话,在需要时调取。
Meta 内部的 MemoryBench 用 64K–100K token 的长对话,加入无关谈话、冲突事实和后续更正,再由大模型按加权标准评分,检验模型能否从混杂信息中找回有效细节、识别事实更新。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MemoryBench:记忆加权得分(%) | 85.5 | 85.6 | 81.5 | 81.4 | 79.0 |
两款模型得分接近,且都高于所列对照,长对话记忆是共同强项。

2. 持续推进:遇到阻碍,换方法接着做
任务做到一半,工具可能报错,资料可能缺失,用户也可能改变要求。Active Focus 会围绕目标尝试替代方案,根据新信息调整后续步骤;关键条件不明确时向用户提问,重要操作前先确认。计划需要随着执行结果更新,才能把任务继续推进。
FocusBench 是 Meta 内部的动态场景测试,覆盖住房、旅行、IT、金融等领域,考察受阻后的坚持与调整。AutomationBench-AA 则在模拟业务应用中检查最终状态,所有检查都通过才算一次成功。前者看能否应对变化,后者看整个流程是否做对。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FocusBench:持续推进得分(%) | 54.2 | 44.9 | 45.8 | 47.7 | 36.6 |
| AutomationBench-AA:完整流程通过率(%) | 45.4 | 39.1 | 41.2 | 41.6 | 32.1 |
Full 在两项中领先所列对照,比普通版分别高出 9.3 和 6.3 个百分点;普通版低于 Astra 和 Opus。与记忆得分接近相比,持续执行是 Full 更明显的提升所在。但 AutomationBench 的完整通过率仍为 45.4%,未达到半数。


实际操作软件,还需要看 OSWorld 2.1。模型在 Ubuntu 桌面虚拟机中,通过截图、点击、输入和滚动完成 108 项工作流,分别报告部分得分与完整完成率。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.1:桌面任务部分得分(%) | 78.4 | 72.6 | 81.8 | 75.8 | 80.7 |
| OSWorld 2.1:桌面任务完整完成率(%) | 39.4 | 34.3 | — | 34.3 | 43.1 |
部分做对也能得到分数,完整完成率只算整个任务达标。Full 的两项成绩分别为 78.4% 和 39.4%;Opus、Fable 的部分得分更高,Fable 的完整完成率也更高。
3. 专业知识:读懂材料,完成专业任务
Domain Expertise 用于处理合同、财报和健康资料:结合原始文件找依据,再按要求分析或起草成果。法律、金融和健康任务的要求不同,评测也分别进行。
法律:Harvey LAB-AA 1.1。 模型根据案件材料生成法律成果,评审系统逐项检查任务要求与编造信息问题,全部达标才算成功。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvey LAB-AA:法律文件全部达标率(%) | 13.1 | 10.0 | 4.2 | 8.6 | 6.4 |
两款模型领先所列对照,但 Full 的通过率仍是 13.1%,大多数成果未同时满足全部标准。

金融:Vals Finance Agent V2。 模型结合财报和市场资料完成分析,在 Vals AI 私有测试集上计算准确率。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Finance Agent V2:金融准确率(%) | 59.1 | 56.6 | 58.6 | 53.5 | 58.9 |
Full 比 Fable 高 0.2 个百分点,与 Opus 的成绩也接近,优势很小。普通版的成绩低于这三款模型。

健康:HealthBench Pro。 模型不调用外部工具,回答 525 道专业健康问题,由大模型按医生制定的标准评分,并按回答长度调整。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HealthBench Pro:健康回答加权得分(%) | 62.3 | 60.5 | 65.6 | 65.3 | 62.1 |
两款 Wonder 都低于 Opus 和 Astra,健康问答尚未领先。
4. Agent 编程:跨文件修改,反复测试和修错
软件开发需要持续跟踪需求,理解代码库,修改相互依赖的文件,再用测试检查新功能和已有行为,根据报错继续修复。Frontier Coding 将记忆、专业知识和持续推进用到这一过程。Meta 用多样、长期开发任务训练两款模型,支持从小应用到复杂软件的持续开发。
DeepSWE 1.1 覆盖 91 个仓库、5 种语言的 113 个任务,用功能和回归测试判断一次尝试是否成功。SWE-Marathon 则让模型完成较大的软件项目,再运行项目测试检查成果。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE 1.1:开发任务通过率(%) | 79.0 | 78.8 | 74.2 | 74.1 | 67.4 |
| SWE-Marathon:长期项目通过率(%) | 57.5 | 53.1 | 46.3 | 42.5 | 45.6 |
两款模型在这两项长期项目评测中,得分均高于 Opus 5.5 和 Astra。DeepSWE 上两者只差 0.2 个百分点,SWE-Marathon 上 Full 高出普通版 4.4 个百分点。
SWE-Marathon 中,Full 使用 xhigh 推理档位,Astra 和 Fable 分别使用 Codex、Claude Code 等 Agent 环境。多数其他结果采用 max 推理档位。


其他工程任务的表现有所不同。Terminal-Bench 4.0 在隔离终端中检查最终环境状态;ProgramBench 要模型在不能联网的环境中重建完整程序,每次尝试通过至少 95% 的隐藏行为测试才算达标。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0:终端任务准确率(%) | 57.1 | 52.0 | 59.6 | 59.1 | 52.0 |
| ProgramBench:程序重建达标率(%) | 59.0 | 50.0 | 70.5 | 52.5 | 55.5 |
终端任务中,Opus 和 Astra 高于 Full;程序重建中,Opus 的 70.5% 明显高于 Full 的 59.0%。
官方厨房演示把这种开发能力用到了一个小应用:根据可定制的图片输入,编写代码,生成可游玩的 3D 厨房小游戏。模型原生输出是文本,游戏由生成的代码交给运行环境执行。
综合评测:两种指标为什么排名不同?
综合指标把多项任务的表现汇总起来。Meta 内部的 Personal Superintelligence Index(PSI) 包含 7 项个人与知识工作评测,涵盖持续执行、业务流程、职业任务、浏览和研究。第三方 Artificial Analysis 综合智能指数 则汇集另一组工作、编程、科学与通用推理测试。
| 评测与指标 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 | Astra | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSI:个人与知识工作综合指标 | 59.1 | 54.3 | 55.2 | 54.5 | 49.9 |
| AA 综合智能指数(分) | 56 | 52 | 58 | 53 | 53 |
Full 在 PSI 中领先,在 AA 综合指数中低于 Opus。两种排名并不矛盾:任务选取和汇总方式不同,衡量的侧重点也不同。



遇到陌生任务,能否灵活应对?
固定测试覆盖有限任务,现实中的目标、工具和要求却不断变化。两个模型的常用测试分数接近,遇到陌生任务时仍可能表现不同。“Benchmaxxing”讨论的正是这种差距:针对固定测试优化,未必能带来同样的现实适应能力。
Meta 对比 Muse Spark 1.3 与 Wonder Full,增加推理时的计算投入,观察它们在后训练未专门针对的任务上表现如何。
怎样看这两条线?
深蓝是 Wonder Full,浅蓝是 Spark 1.3。原图比较两款模型在不同任务上的表现。
选择上方按钮,看横轴、纵轴和两条线的差距。
图中横轴是后训练重点优化的任务成绩,纵轴是后训练未专门针对的任务成绩,每个点对应一种推理投入。两条轨迹都随投入增加而上升;横轴成绩相近时,Wonder Full 的纵轴更高,即它在这组未针对任务上表现更好。
Meta 将提升归因于更大、更强的基础模型,使后训练获得的能力更容易迁移。
个人 Agent 会遇到不同日程、偏好、工具和临时变化形成的新组合,训练无法逐一预设,需要把已有能力用到这些组合中,处理新的需求。
应用演示:从个人资料到具体结果
官方演示让模型调取个人资料,通过浏览器与应用交付路线、订单、座位图或跟进邮件。任务中的偏好、约束和变化,分别用到了前面的记忆、执行与专业理解能力。
跑步:结合健康习惯和日程规划路线
规划周六长跑时,模型从日历和健康记录中找到三项要求:长跑每周增加 1 公里、走平路保护膝盖、10 点前到图书馆。它据此安排 8 点出发的 15.1 公里路线,在基于 OpenStreetMap 数据的地图上每隔 5 公里加标记,生成分享链接,再把带链接的跑步安排写入日历。
礼品:用猫的照片设计 T 恤并下单
用户想给猫 Coco 做生日 T 恤。模型浏览 Coco 的 Instagram 主页,选取真实照片,按偏好设计带金色“COCO”字样的复古乐队风 T 恤,再进入结算、完成订单确认。
婚礼:按宾客要求排座,逐项检查
用户提供 47 位宾客名单,备注无障碍需求、过敏情况和哪些人要分开。模型查看场地布局,把备注转成规则,按这些规则在规划工具里逐桌安排,最后重新对照原始要求逐项检查并导出座位图。
保险:从核对账单到邮件跟进
用户上传门诊账单和保险卡正反面照片。模型对照材料,解释收费问题及保险为何未被应用,提出方案并拟好与诊所账单部门沟通的电话要点。用户希望改用文字跟进,它便调整为起草并发送邮件,最终由诊所账单部门向保险公司提交理赔。
健康:把旅行与症状线索联系起来
模型从日历、消息和邮件中找旅行与症状线索,在连接 Withings、HealthEx 等健康服务前请求许可,再联系海拔和症状出现的时间,帮助用户理解情况。
能代办,也要管好权限
个人 Agent 处理邮件、日程和私密资料时,可能读到夹带恶意指令的外部内容。在 Meta 测试中,Full 的个人信息处理违规率为 2.2%,诱导越权执行代码的攻击成功率为 10.7%。付款、外发信息、修改或删除数据等操作,仍需要系统权限限制与必要确认。


Meta 强化了对化学、生物、放射性、核风险及网络滥用请求的拒答,也保留合规网络防御能力。Full 在 BioTIER 英文测试中的高风险生物请求拒答率为 98.7%,合规网络防御任务配合率为 93.3%,分别衡量拒绝危险用途和帮助正当防御。



依据 Meta 的超级智能扩展框架,未采取缓解措施时,无法排除 Full 在化学与生物领域达到高风险阈值;加入安全后训练和系统级分类器后,Meta 将各领域的剩余风险评为“中度或更低”。
Meta 推出 Muse Wonder 前沿系列模型:主动记忆,遇阻换方法继续推进,Agent 编程媲美 Opus 5.5
100 万 token 是一次推理能处理的材料量。Active Memory 会跨会话保留重要背景,在新任务中找回相关信息并识别更新。MemoryBench 用 64K–100K token 长对话、干扰与事实更正来检验信息使用;两款模型在记忆测试中的成绩接近。
| 评测场景与考察重点 | Full | Wonder | Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MemoryBench(长对话加权记忆) | 85.5% | 85.6% | 81.5% |
| FocusBench(受阻调整与坚持) | 54.2% | 44.9% | 45.8% |
| AutomationBench-AA(业务终态全通过) | 45.4% | 39.1% | 41.2% |
| OSWorld 2.1(桌面端虚拟机操作) | 78.4% / 39.4% | 72.6% / 34.3% | 81.8% / — |
Active Focus 围绕目标尝试替代方案,根据新信息调整步骤;缺少关键条件时提问,重要操作前确认。Full 比普通版在 FocusBench 高 9.3 个百分点、AutomationBench 高 6.3 个百分点,后者要求全部终态检查通过,Full 的通过率仍为 45.4%。OSWorld 两个数依次为部分得分与完整完成率;Fable 为 80.7% / 43.1%,均高于 Full。
跟踪需求、跨文件修改代码,反复运行测试并按报错修复。
两款在长期项目(DeepSWE 与 SWE-Marathon)上均高于 Opus 5.5;但在终端操作与程序重建任务中 Opus 仍具明显优势。(SWE-Marathon 中 Full 采用 xhigh 档位,各对照 Agent 环境略有不同)。
法律任务在严查与防幻觉下虽领先但通过率仅 13.1%;金融任务对 Fable 与 Opus 仅微弱优势;健康领域问答尚未领先,低于 Opus 与 Astra。
提取“每周增 1km、走平路保护膝盖、10 点前到图书馆”三项要求,规划 8 点出发的 15.1km 路线,在地图上每 5km 标记并写入日历。
核对门诊账单和保险卡,解释收费问题;用户希望把电话跟进改为文字,模型转而起草、发送邮件,最终由诊所账单部门提交理赔。
将无障碍、食物过敏及分开就座等备注转为规划规则,在工具中逐桌安排,最终重新对照原始名单逐项复核后导出座位图。
浏览猫 Coco 的照片定制金色文字复古 T 恤并完成结算下单;根据图片输入生成代码,交由环境运行 3D 厨房小游戏。
健康演示从日历、消息、邮件串联旅行与症状线索,连接 Withings、HealthEx 等健康服务前先请求许可。
Meta 对比 Wonder Full 与 Spark 1.3:在后训练重点优化任务的成绩相近时,Full 在后训练未专门针对的任务上得分更高。Meta 将提升归因于更大、更强的基础模型,更容易迁移已有能力。PSI 汇总 7 项个人与知识工作评测,Full 为 59.1、Opus 为 55.2;AA 综合智能指数中 Full 为 56 分、Opus 为 58 分。排名不同,来自测试组合与汇总方式的差别。
代办任务深度接管邮件、日程与私密数据时易接触夹带恶意指令的外部内容。Meta 评测显示,Full 的个人信息处理违规率为 2.2%,诱导越权执行代码的攻击成功率为 10.7%。付款、外发信息、修改或删除关键数据等操作,需要系统级权限限制与必要确认。在危险用途防御上,Full 在 BioTIER 英文高风险生物请求拒答率达到 98.7%,对恶意网络利用严格拦截,合规网络防御配合率为 93.3%。
Muse Wonder: A Frontier Model For Personal & Professional AI Agents
Muse Wonder is Meta's frontier AI model that keeps track of what matters to you with Active Memory & Active Focus to work towards your goals at work & life.

A frontier model that leads on personal and professional agents
Today, we’re excited to introduce the Muse Wonder series with Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full, our most capable models that deliver state-of-the-art performance on personal and professional agentic tasks. Together, they mark the next step on our scaling ladder and a major leap toward personal superintelligence. Muse Wonder brings together Active Memory and Active Focus to keep track of what matters to you and work diligently toward what you want to accomplish.
Muse Wonder is available today through the Meta Model API and Muse Code, and Muse Wonder Full is available today for Muse Code subscribers.
Muse Wonder will soon power experiences in Muse, and will roll out first to subscribers. Muse Wonder will also power artifact generation and processes that require more intelligence. And in the future, we’ll be using Muse Wonder to develop specialized models that we can bring to everyone using Muse.
Scaling Toward Personal Superintelligence
Fourteen months ago, we began a ground-up overhaul of our artificial intelligence efforts. In that time, we’ve gone from rebuilding our stack from first principles to pushing the frontier.
When we introduced Muse Spark, we outlined our approach to predictable, rigorous scaling. Today’s release builds on that work across pretraining and reinforcement learning, delivering our most capable models yet. Trained at our gigawatt-scale Prometheus data center, Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full bring together the work of teams across Meta to deliver frontier capabilities for complex tasks at work and in everyday life — another step toward bringing personal superintelligence to the billions of people who use our products.
Frontier Capabilities
Model Highlights
The Muse Wonder series achieves state-of-the-art results across key benchmarks for personal and professional agents, memory, and coding.
The full results below compare Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full with other frontier models across a broad evaluation suite.
For more details about our evaluations, see our report.
The results above provide a broad view of the models’ performance. We now take a closer look at four areas central to their work on real-world tasks: domain expertise, Active Memory, Active Focus, and frontier coding.
Domain Expertise
Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full apply specialized knowledge to problems people encounter at work and in daily life, from understanding a lease to making sense of financial or health information. Our evaluations include tasks in law, finance, and health that test this ability. Harvey’s Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB), for example, requires models to work with source documents and follow detailed instructions to produce legal work products.
Active Memory
One of the most critical steps towards useful personal and professional agents is reliable memory. Models need to remember what matters and recognize when earlier information becomes relevant. We call this Active Memory: carrying important context about you across conversations and actively retrieving the details relevant to the task at hand.
Active Focus
Using that context to complete a task also requires sustained effort. Active Focus describes how Muse Wonder continues working toward a challenging goal: trying alternative approaches, working through blockers, and adapting to new information. Along the way, it asks for clarification when needed and checks in before taking important actions. We evaluate focus through FocusBench and sustained execution through SWE-Marathon, which tests work on long-running software projects.
Frontier Coding
Coding brings these capabilities together. Building software requires tracking requirements, making changes across a codebase, and working through repeated cycles of testing and revision. Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full deliver frontier coding performance, supporting projects from small applications to complex software. We trained both models on diverse, long-running tasks to help them sustain progress across this process.
Capabilities That Generalize
Two models often have similar benchmark scores, yet one seems to handle a much wider range of unfamiliar tasks. That’s what complaints of “benchmaxxing” and praise for “big model smell” both get at: a breadth of capability that popular benchmarks in a few domains can’t fully capture.
To quantify this mismatch, we investigate how performance on tasks targeted during post-training relates to performance on unfamiliar tasks as we scale test-time compute. The plot below compares Muse Spark 1.3 and Muse Wonder Full, with each point denoting performance at a distinct reasoning effort. The horizontal axis shows the model’s score on a composite representative of the tasks we focused on during post-training (“in-distribution”). The vertical axis shows the average score on a set of tasks we did not target during post-training (“out-of-distribution”).
Both of our models improve similarly on out-of-distribution tasks as we scale test-time compute. But given its in-distribution performance, Muse Wonder Full performs even better on unfamiliar tasks than the Muse Spark 1.3 trend would predict. This upward shift is because Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full build on larger, stronger base models: a stronger base yields post-training gains that carry over more effectively to unfamiliar tasks. That versatility especially matters for personal agents, which need to handle many combinations of goals, tools, and constraints — not all of which we can anticipate during training.
Safety at the Frontier
Delivering personal superintelligence to everyone requires a significant investment in alignment and safety. A personal agent takes actions on a user’s behalf and might handle context such as messages, calendars, and private documents. That level of access demands a model that exercises discretion with private information and resists misuse. We trained the Muse Wonder family to lead on both dimensions, with robustness to adversarial instructions and careful handling of private information.
As models become more capable, our goal is to help people harness those capabilities safely and responsibly. Muse Wonder offers our strongest safeguards to date against CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear) and cyber misuse, while preserving access to frontier cyber capabilities for defensive use, per our Meta Superintelligence Scaling Framework.
Muse Wonder is our most aligned model to date, and alignment is central to how we build personal superintelligence. A full report with additional safety evaluations will be available soon.
We hope that Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full give more people the power to pursue their dreams and build the world they want. This is a major technical step toward personal superintelligence for everyone, with much more to come.

